“1984” Will the left ever learn?

Posted: December 22, 2013 in Uncategorized
Tags: , , , , , ,

“Goldstein was delivering his usual venomous attack
upon the doctrines of the Party–an attack so exaggerated and perverse that
a child should have been able to see through it, and yet just plausible
enough to fill one with an alarmed feeling that other people, less
level-headed than oneself, might be taken in by it. “

~ George Orwell 1984

Looking back, I can still remember the first time that I read this paragraph; it was as if my mind opened and I was assaulted and beaten by the word “Liberal.” And to this day, Liberal still jumps out because this was the how of liberalism then, and it’s still the how now

You know, my life is an open book, if you want to know something, just ask. Now two of the things that I put up front for all to see is my politics and the fact that no matter how good I would like to be, my writing sucks. But all is not lost, I’ve learned that between my ramblings and some well placed quotes I can convey a message that’s honest, truthful, educational and simply cuts through the bull shit. If you can follow along.

Before jumping back to the how of liberalism, let’s look at the why of liberalism.

“At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child — miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats.” ~ P.J. O’Rourke

My experience with liberals parallels that quote. I have had the distasteful task of actually spending time on the leftist sites, Daily Kos, Media matters, Americans against the Republican Party,Mother Jones, Addictinginfo and more. Not a pleasant experience by any stretch of the imagination. Personal responsibility is unknown. Just look at who they championed for the minimum wage increase; a woman who has been working for minimum wage for ten years. McDonald’s is not her problem; she is her problem. And I can’t help but feel that the woman was really encouraged to speak out and kind of like Sandra Fluke, used for political purposes.

Economically illiterate, they want to make policy on things that they don’t understand. They lack an understanding for all policy it seems because they cannot debate on policy. If you follow them you will find that the problems in this world are Fox News, Rush Limbaugh, Citizens United, The Koch Brothers, Guns, Greedy Corporations, Republicans, Racist and homaphobes (Lump them together under Republicans) and income inequality. If these things could be stamped out, the would would be unicorns and rainbows.

That is the why of liberalism. It’s not your fault, it’s somebody else’s fault and the government will take from others and give it to you.  They create division. The reason that you’re poor is because the rich man has your money. SMDH

Ok, back to the how of liberalism. To put it bluntly, instead of open debate, they lie. As Orwell, said, they put just enough truth in it to lure you in and then you get lost in the hyperbole. A child should know better but the liberals will fall for it every time.

So what brought this up? I posted a meme from Americans against the republican party…

jdtytk

Two liberal friends commented it seems correct to them… can you see where things got stretched some? The sad fact is that liberals do not dare question what they are told. Lets put a few more memes up and see if we can spot a trend. Notice the comment on this one.

loony

Here’s one more. I’ll add a few comments to it for fun

1476282_10152082019564255_2091248280_n

Hahahahahaha Liberals eat this kind of stuff up. But what happens when a liberal is faced with rational thought?

  • Alan Peppers Wait a minute now, Since she made the part about shooting people up out whole cloth, that disqualifies her from any discussion.
    • Michelle Schneider Feldman You haven’t been trolling in the right places, Alan – those RWNJs certainly do threaten to shoot … assassination … murder … the whole thing. And not just about “shootin’ dem gubmint moroons who gonna take ma guns.”
    • Robert Williams What do you think all those comments about Second Amendment Solutions was?
    • Sam J. Barris Yeah, I can’t imagine where she would get something like that. http://www.dailykos.com/…/-Facebook-Christian-Militia…

      www.dailykos.com

      So now, Right-Wing ‘Christian’ extremists are making death threats against Presi…See More
    • Alan Peppers Let me see if I understand this? You are painting 50 plus million people by the facebook status of 1 nut. Am I understanding correctly? This site, the Daily Kos, posted an article meant to create division based on the facebook status of 1 nut. I mean really. I’m going to quote another poster right down from here. Scroll down and look, it’s the full quote, nothing taken out of context.

      ” I believe that mental illness of the sort I see in many radical right wing nuts in America today is an epidemic that is being spread by the propaganda of the Koch brothers and Fox News. I even firmly believe that both Koch brothers and Rupert Murdoch and most of his propaganda staff are infected with the insanity they have been spreading. You can se evidence of this insanity by the manner in which so many people on Facebook keep mindlessly repeating the same lies they hear on Fox and see in the media controlled by the Koch brothers and Murdoch.”

      Now let me tweak this to a right wing point of view.

      ” I believe that mental illness of the sort I see in many radical left wing nuts in America today is an epidemic that is being spread by the propaganda of the George Soros and MSNBC News. I even firmly believe that both George Soros and Media Matters and most of his propaganda staff are infected with the insanity they have been spreading. You can se evidence of this insanity by the manner in which so many people on Facebook keep mindlessly repeating the same lies they hear on MSNBC and see in the media controlled by George Soros and the Daily Kos.”

      Is one right and one wrong? Are both right or would believe that they are both wrong?

      My point of posting was to say that you can’t offer an honest debate and start it with hyperbole and rhetoric.

    • Alan Peppers
      Nothing, nada, zip They scurry back to their little holes.
Advertisements

Comments are closed.